Green Tea Consumption and Mortality Due to Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer, and All Causes in Japan (2024)

ContextGreen tea polyphenols have been extensively studied as cardiovascular disease and cancer chemopreventive agents in vitro and in animal studies. However, the effects of green tea consumption in humans remain unclear.

ObjectiveTo investigate the associations between green tea consumption and all-cause and cause-specific mortality.

Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe Ohsaki National Health Insurance Cohort Study, a population-based, prospective cohort study initiated in 1994 among 40530 Japanese adults aged 40 to 79 years without history of stroke, coronary heart disease, or cancer at baseline. Participants were followed up for up to 11 years (1995-2005) for all-cause mortality and for up to 7 years (1995-2001) for cause-specific mortality.

Main Outcome MeasuresMortality due to cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all causes.

ResultsOver 11 years of follow-up (follow-up rate, 86.1%), 4209 participants died, and over 7 years of follow-up (follow-up rate, 89.6%), 892 participants died of cardiovascular disease and 1134 participants died of cancer. Green tea consumption was inversely associated with mortality due to all causes and due to cardiovascular disease. The inverse association with all-cause mortality was stronger in women (P=.03 for interaction with sex). In men, the multivariate hazard ratios of mortality due to all causes associated with different green tea consumption frequencies were 1.00 (reference) for less than 1 cup/d, 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.05) for 1 to 2 cups/d, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.85-1.06) for 3 to 4 cups/d, and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.79-0.98) for 5 or more cups/d, respectively (P=.03 for trend). The corresponding data for women were 1.00, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.84-1.15), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.70-0.95), and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67-0.89), respectively (P<.001 for trend). The inverse association with cardiovascular disease mortality was stronger than that with all-cause mortality. This inverse association was also stronger in women (P=.08 for interaction with sex). In women, the multivariate hazard ratios of cardiovascular disease mortality across increasing green tea consumption categories were 1.00, 0.84 (95% CI, 0.63-1.12), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.52-0.93), and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.53-0.90), respectively (P=.004 for trend). Among the types of cardiovascular disease mortality, the strongest inverse association was observed for stroke mortality. In contrast, the hazard ratios of cancer mortality were not significantly different from 1.00 in all green tea categories compared with the lowest-consumption category.

ConclusionGreen tea consumption is associated with reduced mortality due to all causes and due to cardiovascular disease but not with reduced mortality due to cancer.

Tea is the most consumed beverage in the world aside from water. Three billion kilograms of tea are produced each year worldwide.¹ Because of the high rates of tea consumption in the global population, even small effects in humans could have large implications for public health.² Tea is generally consumed in the forms of green, oolong, and black tea, all of which originate from the leaves of the plant Camellia sinensis. Among teas, green tea polyphenols have been extensively studied as cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer chemopreventive agents.^3-6 Although substantial evidence from in vitro and animal studies indicates that green tea preparations inhibit CVD and carcinogenic processes, the possible protective role of green tea consumption against these diseases in humans remains unclear.

If green tea does protect humans against CVD or cancer, it is expected that consumption of this beverage would substantially contribute to the prolonging of life expectancy, given that CVD and cancer are the 2 leading causes of death worldwide.⁷ To date, 4 studies^8-11 have examined the association between green tea consumption and mortality, but their sample sizes were small and the results were inconsistent.

We therefore designed this prospective analysis to examine the association between green tea consumption and mortality due to all causes, CVD, and cancer within a large population-based cohort study of 40530 persons in Miyagi Prefecture in northeastern Japan, where green tea is widely consumed. Within this region, 80% of the population drinks green tea and more than half of them consume 3 or more cups/d.¹²

The details of the Ohsaki National Health Insurance (NHI) Cohort Study have been described in previous reports.^13-15 In brief, we delivered a self-administered questionnaire, including items on dietary intake (a 40-item food frequency questionnaire [FFQ]), between October and December 1994 to all NHI beneficiaries aged 40 to 79 years living in the catchment area of Ohsaki Public Health Center, Miyagi Prefecture, in northeastern Japan. Ohsaki Public Health Center, a local government agency, provides preventive health services for residents of 14 municipalities in Miyagi Prefecture. Of 54996 eligible individuals, 52029 (95%) responded.

To ascertain the date of and reason for withdrawal from the NHI, we started the prospective collection of NHI withdrawal history files on January 1, 1995. We excluded 774 participants who had withdrawn from the NHI before the baseline questionnaire survey. Thus, 51255 participants ultimately formed the study cohort. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of Tohoku University School of Medicine. We considered the return of self-administered questionnaires signed by the participants to imply their consent to participate in the study.

For current analysis, we excluded participants who died before the collection of NHI withdrawal history files (n=37) and those with missing data on green tea consumption frequency (n=6821), as well as those who reported extreme daily energy intake (n=444; sex-specific cutoffs for upper 0.5%, 3573.5 kcal/d for men and 2289.0 kcal/d for women; for lower 0.5%, 350.5 kcal/d for men and 200.0 kcal/d for women). We also excluded participants who reported a baseline history of cancer (n=1481), myocardial infarction (n=1149), or stroke (n=793), since the presence of these diseases at baseline could have affected their diet and lifestyle. Consequently, our analysis involved 40530 participants.

The questionnaire included items about the frequency of recent average consumption of 4 beverages (green tea, oolong tea, black tea, and coffee) and 36 items about food, as well as items regarding the consumption of alcohol and tobacco, personal and family history of disease, job status, level of education, body weight, height, engaging in sports or exercise, and time spent walking per day. The FFQ did not cover a specific period of time but asked about “everyday diet.” The frequency of green tea consumption was divided into 5 categories: never, occasional, 1 to 2 cups/d, 3 to 4 cups/d, and 5 or more cups/d. Within the study region, the volume of a typical cup of green tea is 100 mL.

We conducted a validation study of the FFQ, in which 113 participants provided four 3-day food records within a period of 1 year and subsequently responded to the questionnaire. The results showed that the Spearman rank coefficient for the correlation between the amounts of green tea consumed according to the questionnaire and the amounts consumed according to the food records was 0.71 for men and 0.53 for women; the correlation between consumption measured by the 2 questionnaires administered 1 year apart was 0.63 for men and 0.64 for women.¹⁶

Because only 7% of the participants said they never drank green tea and only 19% said they drank it only occasionally, data from these respondents were collapsed into the single category of less than 1 cup/d for the purpose of this analysis. We examined the daily consumption of 40 food items, total energy, and nutrients from the FFQ responses by converting the selected frequency category for each food to a daily intake, using portion sizes based on the median values observed in four 3-day diet records. The FFQ used in this study has a high reproducibility and reasonably good validity in assessing the usual levels of intake of nutrients, foods, and food groups among our study population.¹⁶

The end points were all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality. To follow up the participants for mortality and migration, we reviewed the NHI withdrawal history files. When a participant was withdrawn from the NHI system because of death, emigration, or employment, the date of withdrawal and its reason were coded on the NHI withdrawal history files. Because we were unable to obtain subsequent information on the participants who withdrew from the NHI, we discontinued follow-up of participants who withdrew from the NHI system because of emigration or employment.

For decedents identified as described herein, we investigated cause of death by reviewing the death certificates filed at Ohsaki Public Health Center. Cause of death was coded by trained physicians according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10).¹⁷ We identified deaths from CVD as ICD-10 codes I00-I99, coronary heart disease as ICD-10 codes I20-I25, stroke as ICD-10 codes I60-I69, cerebral infarction as ICD-10 code I63, cerebral hemorrhage as ICD-10 code I61, subarachnoid hemorrhage as ICD-10 code I60, cancer as ICD-10 codes C00-C97, gastric cancer as ICD-10 code C16, lung cancer as ICD-10 code C34, and colorectal cancer as ICD-10 codes C18-C21. None of the participants died of unknown causes. Because the Family Registration Law in Japan requires registration of death, death certificates confirmed all deaths that occurred in the study area, except participants who died after emigration from the area.

For all-cause mortality, from January 1, 1995, to December 31, 2005, we prospectively counted the number of person-years of follow-up for each participant, from the beginning of follow-up until the date of death, the date of withdrawal from the NHI, or the end of follow-up, whichever occurred first. For cause-specific mortality, we followed up the participants for up to 7 years (1995-2001). The difference in follow-up times for all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality results from the different sources of information. All-cause mortality data were obtained from the NHI withdrawal history files, which are provided every month and have no information on cause of death. Obtainment of cause-of-death data requires permission from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare to use the National Vital Statistics Database. Seven years of follow-up is the most up-to-date assessment of cause-of-death data in the study area as of August 1, 2006.

Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all-cause and cause-specific mortality according to green tea consumption categories and to adjust for potentially confounding variables, using SAS statistical software, version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). For all models, the proportional hazards assumptions were tested and met through addition of time-dependent covariates to the models. Dummy variables were created for green tea consumption categories. The lowest category of green tea consumption was used as a reference category. The P values for the analysis of linear trends were calculated by scoring the categories, from 1 for the lowest category to 4 for the highest, entering the number as a continuous term in the regression model. In the analyses for oolong tea or black tea as a main exposure, individuals with missing data were excluded (n=9679 for oolong tea and n=10140 for black tea).

We considered the following variables as potential confounders a priori: age at baseline (continuous variable), job status (employed or unemployed), years of education (<10, 10-12, or ≥13), body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared; <18.5, 18.5-22.9, 23.0-24.9, 25.0-29.9, or ≥30.0),^18,19 engaging in sports or exercise (<1 h/wk, 1-2 h/wk, or ≥3 h/wk), time spent walking (<1 h/d or ≥1 h/d), history of hypertension (yes or no), history of diabetes mellitus (yes or no), history of gastric ulcer (yes or no), smoking status (never, former, currently smoking 1-19 cigarettes/d, or currently smoking ≥20 cigarettes/d), alcohol consumption (never, former, current ethanol intake of <45.6 g/d, or current ethanol intake of ≥45.6 g/d), daily total energy intake (continuous variable), daily rice consumption (<3 bowls, 3 bowls, 4 bowls, or ≥5 bowls), daily consumption of miso (soybean paste) soup (yes or no), daily consumption of soybean products, total meat, total fish, dairy products, total fruits, and total vegetables (for each food, continuous variable), and consumption of oolong tea, black tea, or coffee (never or occasionally, 1-2 cups/d, or ≥3 cups/d). To correct the estimates for socioeconomic status, the models were adjusted for job status and the number of years of education. In addition to engaging in sports or exercise, time spent walking was used as a measure of physical activity because it is the most common type of physical exercise among middle-aged and older individuals in rural Japan. The validity and reproducibility of the question on time spent walking has been reported elsewhere.²⁰ Alcohol consumption was classified in terms of go, a traditional Japanese unit of measure equal to approximately 180 mL of sake and containing 22.8 g of ethanol. Interactions between green tea consumption and confounders were tested through addition of cross-product terms to the multivariate model.

To minimize the possibility that diet or lifestyle factors had changed in response to subclinical disease, we repeated all analyses after excluding participants who had died in the first 3 years of follow-up. To ensure that the estimates were not biased by multicollinearity, the age- and sex-adjusted HRs for the green tea consumption categories were also calculated and compared with the multivariate adjusted HRs. All reported P values are 2-tailed, and the differences at P<.05 are considered statistically significant.

Baseline characteristics of the participants by green tea consumption category are shown in Table 1 and Table 2. Participants who consumed green tea more often tended to be older and were more likely to be unemployed, to engage in sports or exercise, and to have a history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus and were less likely to walk, for both men and women. Men were also more likely to have a history of gastric ulcer and women to be obese. Men and women were both also more likely to consume individual foods or beverages such as miso (soybean paste) soup, soybean products, total fish, dairy products, total fruits, total vegetables, oolong tea, and black tea, but less likely to consume coffee. There were no apparent associations between smoking status or alcohol drinking and green tea consumption categories.

Over 11 years of follow-up, among 374174 accrued person-years, the total number of deaths was 4209. The follow-up rate was 86.1%. Table 3 shows the association between green tea consumption and the HRs and associated 95% CIs of mortality due to all causes. We found that green tea consumption was inversely associated with mortality due to all causes and that the inverse association was more pronounced in women (P=.03 for interaction with sex). In men, the multivariate HRs of mortality due to all causes associated with different green tea consumption frequencies were 1.00 (reference) for less than 1 cup/d, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.83-1.05) for 1 to 2 cups/d, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.85-1.06) for 3 to 4 cups/d, and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.79-0.98) for 5 or more cups/d, respectively (P=.03 for trend). The corresponding data in women were 1.00, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.84-1.15), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.70-0.95), and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67-0.89), respectively (P<.001 for trend). We included a variety of potential confounders in our multivariate models; however, the results did not change substantially even after adjustment for these variables. Comparison between the age- and sex-adjusted model and multivariate model suggested that the estimates were not biased by multicollinearity. When we excluded the 1018 participants who died in the first 3 years of follow-up, the results also did not change substantially.

Over 7 years of follow-up, among 252101 total accrued person-years, the total number of deaths was 2931 (892 from CVD and 1134 from cancer). The follow-up rate was 89.6%. Table 4 shows the association between green tea consumption and the HRs and associated 95% CIs of mortality due to CVD and cancer. We found that green tea consumption was inversely associated with mortality due to CVD but not with that due to cancer. The inverse association with CVD mortality was stronger than that with all-cause mortality and the inverse association was also more pronounced in women (P=.08 for interaction with sex). In women, compared with those who consumed less than 1 cup/d of green tea, those who consumed 5 or more cups/d had a 31% lower risk of CVD death. In contrast, the association between green tea consumption and cancer mortality was substantially different. The HRs of cancer mortality were not significantly different from 1.00 in all green tea consumption categories compared with the lowest-consumption (referent) category.

We further investigated the association between green tea consumption and specific CVD and cancer mortality (Table 5, Table 6, and Table 7). In men, green tea consumption was significantly associated with reduced mortality due to stroke. In women, green tea consumption also was significantly associated with reduced mortality due to stroke, especially cerebral infarction. Compared with women who consumed less than 1 cup/d of green tea, those who consumed 5 or more cups/d had 42% and 62% lower risk of death due to stroke and cerebral infarction, respectively. In both men and women, the multivariate HRs of gastric, lung, and colorectal cancer mortality were mostly above unity but not statistically significant.

We conducted further stratified analyses of CVD mortality examining subgroups defined by traditional CVD risk factors and dietary factors. The results in all subgroups showed the same inverse relationship between green tea consumption and CVD mortality, with no interactions noted. Although the interaction was not significant, the inverse association between green tea consumption and CVD mortality appeared to be more pronounced in participants who had never smoked. Among current smokers (n=11614), the multivariate HRs of mortality due to CVD associated with different green tea consumption frequencies were 1.00 (reference) for less than 1 cup/d, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.55-1.14) for 1 to 2 cups/d, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.56-1.17) for 3 to 4 cups/d, and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.62-1.18) for 5 or more cups/d, respectively (P=.43 for trend). The corresponding data among never smokers (n=18775) were 1.00, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.62-1.16), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.51-0.95), and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.56-1.00), respectively (P=.03 for trend).

The multivariate HRs of all-cause mortality according to green tea, oolong tea, and black tea consumption frequencies are compared in Table 8. Green tea consumption was associated with reduced mortality. In contrast, a weak or null association was observed between consumption of black tea or oolong tea and the HRs of all-cause mortality. We were unable to examine the associations between oolong tea or black tea and CVD or cancer mortality because of insufficient numbers of cases of disease among the higher-consumption categories of those beverages.

On the basis of a large, population-based, prospective cohort study, we found significant inverse associations of green tea consumption with mortality due to all causes and due to CVD. Compared with participants who consumed less than 1 cup/d of green tea, those who consumed 5 or more cups/d had a risk of all-cause and CVD mortality that was 16% lower (during 11 years of follow-up) and 26% lower (during 7 years of follow-up), respectively. These inverse associations of all-cause and CVD mortality were primarily observed in women, although the inverse association for green tea consumption was observed in both sexes. In contrast, null results were observed in the association between green tea consumption and cancer mortality.

Sato et al⁸ found a significant inverse association between green tea consumption and stroke mortality in 5910 participants over a 4-year period. Nakachi et al^9,11 reported an observed association between increased consumption of green tea and significantly lower risk of CVD death among 8552 individuals with a follow-up period of 11 to 13 years. Our findings were consistent with these results. In contrast, Iwai et al¹⁰ did not observe significant association between green tea consumption and all-cause mortality, but the results were consistent with an inverse association between green tea consumption and all-cause mortality. The study had a much smaller sample size (2855 participants with 9.9 years of follow-up), and nonsignificant results might be due to low statistical power. Nakachi et al^9,11 also demonstrated that green tea consumption was associated with reduced mortality due to cancer, in contrast with our findings.

The reason for the discrepancy between men and women for the associations of green tea consumption and risk of all-cause and CVD mortality is uncertain. One possibility is the residual confounding by cigarette smoking. Men were more likely to smoke (Table 1 and Table 2), and the inverse associations between green tea consumption and CVD mortality appeared to be more pronounced in participants who had never smoked, although tests for interaction between green tea consumption categories and smoking in the analyses of CVD mortality yielded nonsignificant results. These results suggest that higher rates of smoking may mask the association of green tea consumption with CVD mortality among men.

Our finding of an inverse association between green tea consumption and CVD mortality appeared to be a threshold effect rather than a dose-response relationship, such that persons who consume at least 1 cup/d may receive some benefit. There may be differences in dietary intake and health characteristics besides green tea consumption between the lowest fourth and the highest three fourths of the distribution, suggesting that the observed association may be somehow explained by selection bias. However, in our models we adjusted for various potential confounders, and the estimates did not change substantially from the age- and sex-adjusted estimates.

Our results for CVD mortality may be partly explained by the effect of green tea on CVD risk profile. Previous studies have suggested that green tea may have beneficial effects on CVD risk profile, such as hypertension and obesity.^21,22 However, the present results of stratified analysis show that inverse associations were also evident among lean participants and among those who had no history of hypertension. Therefore, mechanisms other than the effects on traditional CVD risk factors might play a role. Green tea polyphenols, especially (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate, might explain the observed association with reduced all-cause and CVD mortality, irrespective of CVD risk profiles.^23,24 A number of biological mechanisms, including radical scavenging and antioxidant properties, have been proposed for the beneficial effects of green tea in different models of chronic disease.^3-6 The present inverse association between green tea consumption and cerebral infarction mortality, but not cerebral hemorrhage, indicates that green tea polyphenols might directly affect atherosclerosis itself, irrespective of traditional CVD risk profiles.

We observed weak or null relationships between black tea or oolong tea and mortality. The discrepancy between green tea and other teas might indicate the specific role of substances rich in green tea. However, the smaller variations in the consumption of black tea or oolong tea may have contributed in part to the noted lack of association with mortality.

Our study has limitations. First, the number of cases of individual CVD and cancer was only modest at best. Therefore, our study may not have had sufficient statistical power for detecting significant results in coronary heart disease or for detecting small increases or decreases in the risk of cancer at individual sites, as associated with green tea consumption. Second, 10.4% (during 7 years of follow-up) and 13.9% (during 11 years of follow-up) of total participants were lost to follow-up. However, this proportion did not vary across the green tea consumption categories (10.6%, 9.7%, 10.2%, and 10.8% of participants from the lowest to highest green tea consumption categories, respectively, were lost to follow-up during 7 years of follow-up, and 15.2%, 14.8%, 13.4%, and 12.4% of participants, respectively, were lost to follow-up during 11 years of follow-up). Therefore, we consider it unlikely that the association between green tea consumption and mortality was substantially distorted by the effect of loss to follow-up. Third, since green tea consumption was assessed on the basis on self-administered questionnaires, some misclassification of consumption status could arise in estimating the effect of the beverage. However, this misclassification may be nondifferential and would tend to result in underestimation of the impact of green tea consumption.

Healthy or unhealthy behavior, in association with high green tea consumption, could have confounded the correlation between green tea consumption and mortality. Almost all Japanese persons consume green tea as one of their favorite beverages and it is unlikely that green tea consumption was driven by health concerns. Therefore, the possibility that the observed inverse associations between green tea and mortality were confounded by habits related to health consciousness is small. However, although we statistically controlled for a variety of potential confounding factors and conducted analysis after excluding death during the first 3 years of follow-up, and the findings were robust, we could not eliminate residual confounding. Clinical trials are ultimately necessary to confirm the protective effect of green tea on mortality.

Corresponding Author: Shinichi Kuriyama, MD, PhD, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Forensic Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan (kuriyama-thk@umin.ac.jp).

Author Contributions: Dr Kuriyama had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Kuriyama.

Acquisition of data: Kuriyama, Shimazu, Ohmori, Kikuchi, Nakaya, Nishino, Tsubono, Tsuji.

Analysis and interpretation of data: Kuriyama, Shimazu, Ohmori, Kikuchi, Nakaya, Nishino, Tsubono, Tsuji.

Drafting of the manuscript: Kuriyama.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Shimazu, Ohmori, Kikuchi, Nakaya, Nishino, Tsubono, Tsuji.

Statistical analysis: Kuriyama.

Obtained funding: Tsuji.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Shimazu, Ohmori, Kikuchi, Nakaya, Nishino, Tsubono.

Study supervision: Tsuji.

Financial Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by a Health Sciences Research Grant for Health Services (H18-Choju-Ippan-014, H16-Seisaku-Ippan-023, H18-Junkankitou [Seisyu]-Ippan-012), Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Japan.

Role of the Sponsor: The Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare had no role in the design or conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.